단어 & 글자 수 세기
단어, 글자, 문장, 단락 수와 예상 읽기 시간 계산.
이 도구에 대해
단어, 글자, 문장, 단락 수와 예상 읽기 시간 계산.
사용 방법
- 1 텍스트를 입력란에 붙여넣거나 직접 입력하세요.
- 2 단어, 글자, 문장, 단락 수와 예상 읽기 시간 계산.
- 3 메인 카운트 아래에서 공백이 있는/없는 문자 수를 확인하세요.
- 4 SEO 메타 설명(160자 이내), 트윗(280자) 또는 학술 단어 제한에 활용하세요.
What a word counter actually counts
"Counting words" sounds trivial until you ask what a word is. Is don't one word or two? Is state-of-the-art one or four? Different tools answer differently, which is why two counters can disagree on the same paragraph. This tool defines a word the way most editors and word processors do: a run of non-whitespace characters. Technically it matches the pattern \S+ — every cluster of characters separated by spaces, tabs, or line breaks counts as one word. By that rule don't and state-of-the-art are each a single word, because neither contains a space.
Knowing the rule matters when you are writing to a strict limit. A 500-word essay limit measured by whitespace runs will treat a hyphenated compound as one word, whereas a grammar-based counter might split it. When in doubt, count with the same tool your grader or editor uses.
The eight metrics, and how each is computed
| Metric | How it is measured |
|---|---|
| Words | Count of non-whitespace runs (\S+) |
| Characters | Every character including spaces and line breaks |
| No spaces | Characters with all whitespace removed |
| Sentences | Segments ending in ., !, or ? |
| Paragraphs | Blocks separated by one or more blank lines |
| CJK characters | Chinese, Japanese, and Korean glyphs counted individually |
| Reading time | Words ÷ 200 words per minute, rounded |
| Speaking time | Words ÷ 130 words per minute, rounded |
The two character counts are useful for different limits. Social platforms and SEO meta tags usually count all characters including spaces (a tweet, a 160-character meta description), while some old SMS or database fields effectively care about the no-spaces length. Having both side by side saves you from guessing.
Why CJK text is counted separately
Chinese, Japanese, and Korean are not space-separated languages. A Chinese sentence can be hundreds of characters with no spaces at all, so the whitespace-based word count would report it as one or two "words" — clearly wrong. This tool therefore counts CJK glyphs individually as their own metric. It also adjusts reading and speaking time for CJK by treating two characters as roughly one word-equivalent, so a Chinese document still gets a sensible time estimate even when its word count is near zero.
A worked example
Take the text: Hello world. How are you? The tool reports 5 words (Hello, world., How, are, you?), 25 characters including the space and punctuation, 21 characters with spaces stripped, 2 sentences (one ends in ., one in ?), and 1 paragraph. Reading time rounds to 0 minutes because five words is a fraction of the 200-per-minute pace — the estimate is meaningful for articles, not single lines.
Reading and speaking time, in context
The 200 words-per-minute figure is a widely used average for silent adult reading of general prose; technical material reads slower, light fiction faster. The 130 words-per-minute speaking rate reflects a clear, unhurried presentation pace — useful for sizing a speech or a video script. Because both are rounded to whole minutes, short texts show 0m; the numbers become reliable around the length of a blog post. Use them as planning estimates, not stopwatch guarantees.
Practical use cases and tips
- Essays and assignments. Track a hard word limit live as you write, without leaving the page.
- SEO and meta tags. Keep titles near 60 characters and descriptions near 155 using the all-characters count.
- Speeches and scripts. Use speaking time to fit a talk into a slot — a 10-minute talk is roughly 1,300 words.
- Paragraph hygiene. Remember the tool splits paragraphs on blank lines. Single line breaks inside a block stay in one paragraph, so press Enter twice to register a new one.
Everything is computed in your browser as you type, so even a long manuscript never leaves your device and the counts update instantly.